A piece of Americana is being destroyed – creatively
destroyed. Most of us probably haven’t even taken a moment’s pause to consider
the extinction of the entities that once held a predominant place in the
nation’s department, grocery, and drug stores. With its banishment, we are
approaching a time when a whole generation won’t fully understand why Robin
Williams stepped out of his usual comedic roles to star in Mark Romanek’s
psychological thriller “One
Hour Photo.” I mean, why would you need an
intermediary to look at your photos before you upload them to Facebook* –
or, conversely, why would you steal someone’s photos when you can anonymously
look at them on Instagram?
The one hour photo is a victim of technological
change. After all, photos were taken to share with family and friends – it was
the “status” update of the 1950s to the very early 2000s. Today, our mobile
phones are the cameras. Digitization is the modus operandi.
Yet, this post is not about the passing of an industry
lost to technological change. It is about
the impact of technological change on our communities and their workers.
Creative destruction – whether it is the demise of a one hour photo department
or automation replacing workers at a factory – is the natural progression of
our continually evolving technological environ. Communities can either be at
the forefront of this change or must adjust their local economy and workforce
to the shifting economic tides.
Over the last 29 years of my life (i.e. all of it),
I’ve developed photos at a store twice – just twice. And it seems that America
isn’t as prone to develop their photos at a store either. In 2002, national One
Hour Photo (NAICS 812922) employment stood at 11,611 workers. By 2012, total
employment stands at just 1,442. An 87.6 percent decline or 10,169 people
needing a new line of work. This isn’t an anomaly. Apple, Samsung, Motorola,
Nokia, et. al have drastically changed how we take a photo while Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Flickr have
drastically altered how we share a
photo. Without both evolutions, I’d
argue, speedy film development would still be a thing.
The whole photography industry is reeling from
improving mobile phone photo quality, digital cameras, and photo sharing. Employment
within the photography sector declined 39.9 percent – 96,845 jobs – over the
last decade. Barring some sort of technological change or massive alteration to
the sector’s business model (see the first footnote), photography employment is
vanishing – it transcends decline. The implications for vanished employment
vastly differ from general employment decline – the shift is structural, those
workers unable to adjust will almost certainly require retraining to make their
skills valuable in the new economic
climate.
Communities swept up in the changing tides
of technology – or business strategy – would do well to first identify the
types of occupations facing layoffs. After that, you need to place these
occupations into two categories: 1) those that will easily adjust to the
changing landscape (i.e. those occupations whose skills will easily transfer),
and 2) those who will likely require retraining. If we look at the list below, for
example, Parking Lot Attendants, Retail Salespersons, Cashiers, Customer
Service Representatives, Office Clerks, and General and Operations Managers
could likely transfer to other departments within a store, or find employment
within the retail sector.**
On the other hand, Photographers;
Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators; and Mixing and
Blending Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders; represent a wholly different
challenge – skills within these occupations are highly tied to the photography
sector and will likely not translate well to other business sectors. When
skills don’t easily to other economic sectors, intervention is needed – community
stakeholders must coax out retraining opportunities. For ease, we’ll just focus
in on Photographic Process Workers and Processing Machine Operators (Film
Developers).
Photography Sector: Top Declining
Occupations
O-Net – a primary source of occupational
information provided by the Bureau of Labor Statics – divides an occupation
into its three component requirements: knowledge, skills, and abilities. By
comparing the knowledge, skills, and abilities of Film Developers with other
occupations, stakeholders can identify occupations with the highest retraining
potential. Before you identify which occupations make sense, having a full
understanding of the strengths of your local economy will greatly aid
identification. For simplicity’s sake, we’ll assume your local economy has a
strong semiconductor sector. Film Developers and Semiconductor Processors –
workers who manufacturer electronic semiconductors – share many commonalities.
In the above graphic displays the
knowledge level of Film Developers (knowledge overlap) and Semiconductor
Processors (Knowledge Gap). In essence, red represents a gap between Film Developers
and Semiconductor Processors. As you can see, Film Developers share some common
knowledge sets including Administration and Management, Customer and Personal
Service, and Chemistry. Gaps – which can also be seen as retraining
opportunities – exist in Engineering and Technology, Public Safety and
Security, and the English Language. Improving writing skills, STEM education,
and hazardous material handling would assist in retraining Film Developers for
employment within the semiconductor manufacturing sector.
Source: EMSI
Film Developers’ skills will also need further
honing and improvement. Skill development should be formed in conjunction with
local semiconductor employers – skills are intricately tied to place. General
skillsets that can be improved in the classroom include reading comprehension,
speaking, and social perceptiveness. Equipment maintenance, quality control
analysis, and operation monitoring are skills better suited for apprenticeship
programs or learning labs that simulate the workplace.
Source: EMSI
Abilities are enduring attributes of the
individual that influence performance***
and are far more difficult to teach in a classroom setting – though not
impossible. Abilities can be learned and improved over time by repetition.
Finger Dexterity, written expression, and multilimb coordination possess the largest
skills gaps between Film Developers and Semiconductor Processors, however, few
abilities possess significant gaps.
Don’t possess a vibrant semiconductor
sector? Well, you get the gist. If your community has been unfavorably impacted
by the changing economic landscape, or simply suffered a large closing or
relocation, the steps are fairly simple to follow – albeit tough to implement.
1. Be Proactive – start – if you haven’t already – the conversation now. Once the event is announced, you’ll be at a disadvantage. Time is critical. A target sector analysis with a robust occupational evaluation and economic development strategy is a crucial step in improving the turnaround time.
2. Identify the best use of resources – separate occupations between those that the market will sort out – i.e. those with the transferable skills – and those in which retraining is a must.
3. Identify the knowledge, ability, and skill gaps for each targeted occupation – get advice and insight from employers.
4. Work with higher education and Workforce Investment Boards to develop a targeted retraining program – greatly informed by perspective employers’ knowledge and stated demand.
5. Formulate mentorship, internship, or apprenticeship programs for retrained workers – important for “proving” the value of the program to perspective employers.
6. Maintain relationships – this might happen again, so keep the dialogue going.
Identifying skill overlap is time consuming, complex, and requires hefty data lifting. However, informed decisions about worker retraining and retooling can greatly improve the ability of your economy to recover from a mass layoff or significant job loss caused by technological change.
Of course, workforce development efforts combined with identified targeted business sectors and a holistic economic development strategy will greatly assist retraining efforts. It is about having the processes and relationships to respond to change. It is about building a resilient local economy.
* - Admittedly, this might be a useful service for Facebook’s denizens. Consider this free business advice – I require a small, five percent stake. You’re welcome.
** I’m leaving out Nonfarm Animal Caretakers, I honestly can’t think of any reason why they would be on the list. I just keep thinking “petting zoos.”
*** Definition via O-Net.
1. Be Proactive – start – if you haven’t already – the conversation now. Once the event is announced, you’ll be at a disadvantage. Time is critical. A target sector analysis with a robust occupational evaluation and economic development strategy is a crucial step in improving the turnaround time.
2. Identify the best use of resources – separate occupations between those that the market will sort out – i.e. those with the transferable skills – and those in which retraining is a must.
3. Identify the knowledge, ability, and skill gaps for each targeted occupation – get advice and insight from employers.
4. Work with higher education and Workforce Investment Boards to develop a targeted retraining program – greatly informed by perspective employers’ knowledge and stated demand.
5. Formulate mentorship, internship, or apprenticeship programs for retrained workers – important for “proving” the value of the program to perspective employers.
6. Maintain relationships – this might happen again, so keep the dialogue going.
Identifying skill overlap is time consuming, complex, and requires hefty data lifting. However, informed decisions about worker retraining and retooling can greatly improve the ability of your economy to recover from a mass layoff or significant job loss caused by technological change.
Of course, workforce development efforts combined with identified targeted business sectors and a holistic economic development strategy will greatly assist retraining efforts. It is about having the processes and relationships to respond to change. It is about building a resilient local economy.
* - Admittedly, this might be a useful service for Facebook’s denizens. Consider this free business advice – I require a small, five percent stake. You’re welcome.
** I’m leaving out Nonfarm Animal Caretakers, I honestly can’t think of any reason why they would be on the list. I just keep thinking “petting zoos.”
*** Definition via O-Net.